 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Brooks v. Barnhart, No. 04-15716,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 16, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Substantial evidence supported denial of SSDI benefits based on finding claimant did not have severe impairment that qualified as disability under mental retardation listing set forth at 12.05, 20 C.F.R. pt. 404, subpt. P, app. 1, § 12.05, as no medical professional opined that claimant had significantly subaverage general intellectual functioning.
|
|||||
| Campos-Gonzalez v. Gonzales, No. 04-73543,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 16, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Contreras-Rubio v. Gonzales, No. 04-74539,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 16, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Coronado v. Gonzales, No. 04-73990,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 16, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where an alien, a citizen of Guatemala, testified that she saw guerillas kill her brother in 1980 and that the guerillas threatened her and her family, but her father remained in Guatemala without incident, the evidence did not compel the conclusion that the alien proved she was entitled to withholding of removal.
|
|||||
| Downing v. Barnhart, No. 04-55399,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 16, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where ALJ found that consulting clinical psychologist's (CCP) opinion was unsupported by, and inconsistent with, the medical evidence, the ALJ did not err by giving no persuasive weight to the CCP's opinion or the opinion of a non-examining state agency physician, whose opinion was based only on CCP's unsupported report.
|
|||||
| Garcia-Rodriguez v. Gonzales, No. 04-71263,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 16, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where IJ had already granted aliens an extension to file their applications for cancellation of removal and accepted those applications, filed months after the extended deadline expired, IJ did not deny aliens due process by denying them a continuance to obtain evidence in support of their hardship claims.
|
|||||
| Gjika v. Gonzales, No. 03-74361,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 16, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Hanzy v. Schomig, No. 05-15069,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 16, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Hernandez v. Gonzales, No. 04-76178,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 16, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
