 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Friedman v. United States EPA, No. 05-15664,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 15, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court properly upheld an order of the Environmental Appeals Board, finding that plaintiffs' removal of asbestos from a demolition site violated the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C.S. §§ 7412, 7414, because plaintiffs had fair notice of the regulation in question as it was published in the Federal Register and was not impermissibly nebulous.
|
|||||
| Richardo v. FDIC, No. 04-56373,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 15, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Thorson v. Palmer, No. 02-17359,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 15, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because an inmate's state habeas petition was denied as untimely, he was not entitled to tolling while his untimely petition was pending in state court. Without that tolling, his federal habeas corpus petition fell outside the 28 U.S.C.S. § 2244 one-year limitation period for a state prisoner filing a federal habeas corpus petition.
|
|||||
| United States v. Alvarez, No. 05-50806,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 15, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant was not entitled to reversal of sentence pursuant to guilty plea to distribution of drugs in violation of 21 U.S.C.S. § 841(a)(1) because defendant's indictment, which expressly alleged that offense involved approximately 205 grams of methamphetamine, was sufficient to put him on notice that he was subject to sentencing enhancement.
|
|||||
| United States v. Ayon-Perez, No. 06-50110,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 15, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Bazell, No. 05-50176,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 15, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Boechler, No. 06-30229,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 15, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Boy, No. 06-30113,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 15, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Edwards, No. 06-30163, No. 06-30165,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 15, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
