LexisNexis
  

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   Federal Courts - 9th Circuit Court of Appeals - February 16, 2006

  
United States v. Walton, No. 05-50101, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 16, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
United States v. Whitney, No. 05-10236, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 16, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
United States v. Widmer, No. 05-10031, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 16, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
United States v. Wise, No. 05-30413, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 16, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Vargas-Perez v. Gonzales, No. 04-73076, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 16, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Court denied in part a petition for review of the decision denying an alien cancellation of removal under 8 U.S.C.S. § 1229b; for immigration purposes, "residence" was the place where the alien was physically present, and he failed to prove he had seven years of continuous physical presence in the United States.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Wang v. Gonzales, No. 04-71338, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 16, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Where an alien's testimony about the injuries he inflicted on a family planning official and about the injuries the alien sustained during an arrest were inconsistent with statements in his application, and the former testimony was also internally inconsistent, substantial evidence supported denial of the alien's claim for withholding of removal.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Wu v. Gonzales, No. 04-76744, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 16, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Wynglarz v. Roe, No. 04-56533, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 16, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Yundi Gao v. Gonzales, No. 04-76415, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 16, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Zhu v. Gonzales, No. 04-71129, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 16, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Substantial evidence supported denial of alien's application for asylum based upon an adverse credibility determination where the record supported an IJ's finding that the alien's testimony was inherently unreliable due to the egregiousness of the alien's admitted fraud. Alien had twice engaged in fraud before INS officers while he was under oath.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

  www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us
  CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.