 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| SEC v. Small Cap Research Group, Inc., No. 05-15638,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 16, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court's entry of default judgment against defendants was unremarkable where defendants had neither filed an answer to the securities violations complaint filed by the Securities and Exchange Commission for months after it was due, nor offered any plausible explanation why not.
|
|||||
| Santy v. Charter Oak Unified Sch. Dist., No. 05-55366,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 16, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A district court abused its discretion by limiting an award of attorney's fees under 20 U.S.C.S. § 1415(i)(3)(B) of the IDEA for the services of plaintiffs' attorney to $ 1500 based on the fee negotiated in a legal services agreement without actually calculating the reasonable number of hours expended at a reasonable hourly rate.
|
|||||
| Scrofani v. Chrones, No. 06-55171,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 16, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Soares-Haae v. Roche, No. 05-15566,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 16, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because an employee's supervisor questioning him about Hawaiian sovereignty in a derogatory manner on one occasion was the only evidence of unwelcome racially-based conduct against the employee, he had failed to show an abusive work environment that was actionable under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.S. § 2000e et seq.
|
|||||
| Specktor v. Citibank [S.D.], N.A., No. 05-55058,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 16, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Thind v. Gonzales, No. 05-70600,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 16, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. A.P.O.T., No. 06-30307,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 16, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Bedenfield, No. 06-10103,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 16, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court's guideline range determination was within the scope of the sentencing guideline stipulations contained in a plea agreement because the stipulations regarding appellant's guideline range were to an assumption and a belief, not to an agreed upon criminal history category. Accordingly, the sentence was consistent with the plea agreement.
|
|||||
| United States v. Cantrell, No. 06-30276,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 16, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
