 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Karapetyan v. Gonzales, No. 04-70747,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 17, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Alien's testimony that the "hooligans and criminals" kidnapped him and demanded money did not establish that the alien was persecuted on account of a protected ground as required for asylum under 8 U.S.C.S. § 1101(a)(42). He also failed to link the alleged persecution to the government or a group the government would or could not control.
|
|||||
| Lightner v. Prospect Enters., No. 04-16169,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 17, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Mimms v. Petrucelli, No. 05-15658,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 17, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Namasivayam v. Gonzales, No. 03-74420,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 17, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An alien's petition for review of the decision denying him asylum and withholding of removal was denied where the IJ denied relief on the ground that the alien was not credible, and the record did not compel a contrary conclusion because the alien presented vague testimony that contained inconsistencies that went to the heart of his claim.
|
|||||
| Passarelli v. Hickman, No. 04-17326,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 17, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Patterson v. Rollins, No. 05-16053,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 17, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A district court's order that dismissed a prisoner's § 1983 action was reversed and remanded for the district court to consider the prisoner's claim regarding his inmate trust account in light of a supervening decision where the prisoner's complaint alleged that prison staff told him that account deductions were "non-grievable."
|
|||||
| Patterson v. Schriro, No. 05-16032,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 17, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Salazar v. Gonzales, No. 04-73431,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 17, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Uluwita v. Gonzales, No. 04-72440,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 17, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Alien failed to demonstrate that he was eligible for asylum where substantial evidence supported the BIA's decision that the alien failed to establish past persecution or a well-founded fear of future persecution on account of an enumerated ground because there was no evidence that the alien was perceived as having any particular political opinion.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
