 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| United States v. Brown, No. 04-50397,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 17, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Chief, No. 05-30214,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 17, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court did not err in denying defendant's motion to dismiss indictment under 18 U.S.C.S. §§ 1153, 2241(a), which was issued seven years after alleged sexual abuse; 2003 amendment of 18 U.S.C.S. § 3283 extended statute of limitations for sexual abuse crimes involving children without reverting to five-year period under 18 U.S.C.S. § 3282(a).
|
|||||
| United States v. Child, No. 05-35135,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 17, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Harpole, No. 04-10621,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 17, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's conviction for attempted tax evasion and failure to file income tax returns in violation of 26 U.S.C.S. §§ 7201 and 7203 was affirmed because defendant was not prejudicially misled as a result of the indictment's failure to cite the applicable tax code as the indictment sufficiently detailed the elements of the charged offenses.
|
|||||
| United States v. Lamere, No. 04-30178,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 17, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Indictment that identified defendant as someone within the territorial jurisdiction of the U.S. who knowingly engaged in a sexual act on or about a specific date, in a specific place, with a specific person identifiable to defendant, in a specific way, in violation of particular statutes, sufficiently informed defendant of the charges against him.
|
|||||
| United States v. Loya-Torres, No. 04-10538,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 17, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Meadows, No. 04-10696,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 17, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Regin-Lucano, No. 04-50106,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 17, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Salazar-Salazar, No. 05-50313, No. 05-50315,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 17, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
