 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Lopez v. Musinorte Entm't Corp., No. 05-15486,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 21, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Evidence of recording agreements and a trademark application was sufficient to create a genuine issue of material fact about whether a drummer and other band member defendants associated as co-owners of a business for profit pursuant to Ariz. Rev. Stat. §§ 29-1001(11) and 29-1012(A) (2007). Summary judgment was reversed.
|
|||||
| Milligan v. Scribner, No. 05-55820,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 21, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court properly concluded that 28 U.S.C.S. § 2254 habeas petition was untimely because petitioner was not entitled to equitable tolling based on his claim of inadequate library resources at a prison, as he failed to show a causal link between the library's limitations and the six and one-half year delay in the filing of his habeas petition.
|
|||||
| United States v. E.F.B., No. 05-30459,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 21, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Gonzales, No. 06-30035,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 21, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. McCray, No. 05-50488,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 21, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Zaffina v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp., No. 05-55245,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 21, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court retained jurisdiction over claims that were preempted under § 301 of LMRA, 29 U.S.C.S. § 185(a), and remanded non-preempted claims to state court. District court never issued final judgment as to preempted claims; thus, plaintiff did not appeal from final judgment under 28 U.S.C.S. § 1291, and court lacked jurisdiction over appeal.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
