 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Kaur v. Gonzales, No. 04-74689,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 21, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Khanania v. Chertoff, No. 05-15217,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 21, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Laing v. Gallegos, No. 04-35945,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 21, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Lopez v. Gonzales, No. 04-76090,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 21, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Mann v. Gonzales, Nos. 03-72753, 04-72261, 04-74762,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 21, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Petition for review was denied because substantial evidence support the immigration judge's adverse credibility determination because there were several inconsistencies in the alien's testimony. The alien had the burden to show that a better translation would have made a difference in the outcome of the hearing.
|
|||||
| Marin-Gonzalez v. Gonzales, No. 04-72872,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 21, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Denial of an application for cancellation of removal was affirmed. The IJ correctly determined that petitioner's conviction for robbery constituted a crime of moral turpitude; moreover, petitioner could not utilize the petty offense exception because he was convicted of a felony.
|
|||||
| Minasyan v. Gonzales, No. 04-70843,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 21, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Morales-Sandoval v. Gonzales, No. 04-72041,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 21, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: On the continuous physical presence issue, since the court could not determine whether petitioner's return by immigration officials was result of a "turn-around" at the border or by administrative voluntary departure, the court remanded case to BIA for further proceedings on the nature of petitioner's contact with immigration officials in 1993.
|
|||||
| Munoz v. Gonzales, No. 04-73758,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 21, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| Copyright© 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
