 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Singh v. Gonzales, No. 04-76416,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 21, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where IJ noted that alien's testimony was unspecific and contradictory regarding the reason for his arrest, his flight from India to Nepal, and his membership in a political party, substantial evidence supported the IJ's adverse credibility finding and the denial of the alien's application for asylum and other relief.
|
|||||
| Singh v. Gonzales, No. 04-74095,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 21, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Alien's petition for review was denied, under 8 U.S.C.S. § 1252, where the record did not compel a finding that alien was credible, the discrepancies in alien's testimony regarding his first arrest went to the heart of alien's claim, and, in the absence of credible evidence, alien failed to show eligibility for asylum or withholding of removal.
|
|||||
| Singh v. Gonzales, No. 04-71319,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 21, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Singh v. Gonzales, No. 04-76688,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 21, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An alien's petition for review was denied where, in the absence of credible testimony, the alien failed to establish eligibility for asylum, withholding of removal, or CAT relief, and the court upheld the IJ's adverse credibility finding because no reasonable factfinder would have been compelled to reach a contrary conclusion.
|
|||||
| Slape v. City of Long Beach, No. 04-55881,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 21, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Soto v. Gonzales, No. 04-74562,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 21, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Taylor v. Melching, No. 04-17416,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 21, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Dismissal of state prisoner's § 1983 action was vacated and remanded as to his access to courts claim where prisoner's allegations were sufficient to survive review under screening provision, 28 U.S.C.S. § 1915A, and require government to respond. Prisoner failed to state due process claim because state provided an adequate post-deprivation remedy.
|
|||||
| Taylor v. Stewart, No. 03-16793,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 21, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Terteryan v. Gonzales, No. 03-73446,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 21, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: BIA properly denied application for asylum filed by citizen of Armenia because record did not compel conclusion that applicant had political opinion at the time that he was beaten by military officers in Armenia upon asserting exemption from military service and failing to pay bribe; record also did not show that opinion was imputed to applicant.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
