 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| United States v. Villa, No. 04-10653,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 21, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's sentence was affirmed because he failed to show that his attorney faced an actual conflict of interest or that the conflict caused his attorney to change his legal strategy in a way that hurt defendant. Although the language used by the probation officer was strong, defendant admitted that the characterization were accurate.
|
|||||
| United States v. Villegas, No. 05-50175,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 21, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Denial of the motion to suppress was affirmed because review of sealed materials submitted by a special agent in which the agent described a confidential source's reliability and detailed information the source had provided was sufficient to establish probable cause to arrest defendant and the court would not unseal the documents.
|
|||||
| United States v. Woodcook, No. 05-30252,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 21, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court clearly erred in enhancing defendant's advisory sentence for reckless endangerment under USSG § 3C1.2; there was nothing to indicate that defendant created a substantial risk of death or serious bodily injury to another person by driving at an "increased" speed near a mobile home park.
|
|||||
| Villafana-Benitez v. Gonzales, No. 03-74264,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 21, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because the court could not determine whether petitioner's return to Mexico by immigration officials was the result of a "turn-around," or an administrative voluntary departure, the court granted the petition and remanded to the BIA for further proceedings concerning the nature of petitioner's contact with immigration officials in January 1994.
|
|||||
| Villagomez v. Gonzales, No. 04-70974,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 21, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Virk v. Gonzales, No. 04-74691,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 21, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Substantial evidence did not support the IJ's adverse credibility finding because it was based on speculation and conjecture; the IJ speculated about whether Indian authorities would have arrested petitioner under the circumstances he described, and whether the authorities would have known that petitioner left for the United States.
|
|||||
| Wall v. Wilson, No. 05-15402,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 21, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Whittaker v. Brooks Protective Servs., No. 04-56860,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 21, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Yambao v. Gonzales, No. 04-76508,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 21, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
