 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Hughes v. U.S. Foodservice, Inc., No. 04-56210, No. 04-56943, No. 04-56881,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 22, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Evidence supported trial court's finding that employer violated Cal. Gov't Code § 12940(m) and (n) by failing to provide, and to consider, a reasonable accommodation for an employee's disability; employee could have performed new customer service position from home. Employee was entitled to recover computer research costs as attorneys' fees.
|
|||||
| Janis v. Gonzales, No. 04-56315,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 22, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court did not err in determining that pro se prisoner failed to exhaust available administrative remedies prior to filing his 42 U.S.C.S. § 1983 action.
|
|||||
| Jay v. Comm'r, No. 05-72216,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 22, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Jimenez Resendiz v. Gonzales, No. 04-75493,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 22, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Jorss v. Schwarzenegger, No. 03-15217,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 22, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Kaur v. Gonzales, No. 04-72026,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 22, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying alien's motion to reopen removal proceedings where alien failed to establish prima facie eligibility for asylum or withholding of removal, under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(1), because the newspaper articles she submitted were too general to demonstrate an objective basis for fearing persecution in India.
|
|||||
| Lamarca v. Moers, No. 04-16126,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 22, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Lemus v. Gonzales, No. 04-76768,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 22, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Substantial evidence supported IJ's determination that the alien was not eligible for asylum because she failed to show that her assault, the continued threats, and the abduction of her children, was persecution "on account of" a political opinion imputed to her by the guerillas; rather, they were inflicted to silence her as a witness to a crime.
|
|||||
| Lopez-Sanchez v. Gonzales, No. 04-74760,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 22, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Substantial evidence supported IJ's determination that alien was not eligible for asylum or withholding of removal because the unspecified threats made against his family and his fellow ranch workers did not constitute persecution. Substantial evidence supported IJ's conclusion that alien failed to establish well-founded fear of future persecution.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
