 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Lowry v. Comm'r, No. 04-71950, IRS No. 11579-00,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 22, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Pursuant to Cal. Civ. Code § 1057, property was conveyed by a taxpayer's partnership when escrow closed and the deed was recorded in 1994; thus, the taxpayers should have recognized and reported their resulting 26 U.S.C.S. § 1231 gain in 1994 and the tax court properly affirmed the tax deficiencies assessed by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue.
|
|||||
| Martin v. City of Reno, No. 04-15708,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 22, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Mendoza v. Gonzales, No. 04-76029,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 22, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Meyer v. Comm'r, No. 05-74459,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 22, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Minteer v. Comm'r, No. 05-74551,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 22, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Morrison v. Comm'r, No. 05-72462,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 22, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Mulholland v. Holliday, No. 04-17105,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 22, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where prisoner alleged defendants' refusal to address his serious medical needs occurred over a five-year period, which would make prisoner's claims untimely under Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-542, but he also appeared to allege ongoing violations, construing the complaint very liberally, prisoner asserted claims that were within the limitations period.
|
|||||
| Murray v. Ariz. Dep't of Corr., No. 04-17269,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 22, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Prisoner's allegations that certain defendants directed subordinates to discriminate against him based on his choice of religion, and that he was not allowed to engage in Sikh religious practices appeared to state a claim for violation of his free exercise of religion. Thus, order dismissing this claim was vacated and § 1983 case was remanded.
|
|||||
| Nordettur v. Gonzales, No. 04-75322,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 22, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
