 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Singh v. Gonzales, No. 04-74058,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 22, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Alien's petition for review of the decision denying his applications for withholding of removal and CAT relief was denied, under 8 U.S.C.S. § 1252, where IJ's adverse credibility finding was supported by substantial evidence because the alien failed to explain adequately discrepancies between his testimony and the written documents in the record.
|
|||||
| Stocker v. Bess, No. 03-35972,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 22, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Swanstrom v. Boeing Co., No. 05-35782,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 22, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Taylor v. City of Yorba Linda, No. 04-55952,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 22, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court affirmed the summary judgment for defendants on plaintiff's § 1983 claims that defendants conspired to violate plaintiff's First Amendment right to run for office; plaintiff offered no affirmative evidence that comments made to a political supporter resulted from a municipal policy or custom, rather than personal animus toward plaintiff.
|
|||||
| Taylor v. Comm'r, No. 05-74591,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 22, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Toj-Gonzalez v. Gonzales, No. 04-73391,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 22, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Avilez-Zamora, No. 04-10687,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 22, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Bad Marriage, No. 05-30149,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 22, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court did not fail to comply with appellate court's mandate when it imposed longer sentence on remand; district court properly took the newly advisory Sentencing Guidelines into account and considered factors of 18 U.S.C.S. § 3553(a) in determining that brutality of assault under 18 U.S.C.S. §§ 113(a)(6), 1153 warranted 48-month sentence.
|
|||||
| United States v. Barrientos-Maldonado, No. 05-10255,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 22, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where trial court explicitly stated that it had considered factors set forth in 18 U.S.C.S. § 3553, and defendant did not contest his prior aggravated felony conviction, which, combined with his deportation, authorized a statutory maximum term of 20 years' imprisonment, defendant's 57-month sentence for violating 8 U.S.C.S. § 1326 was reasonable.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
