 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| United States v. Hagege, No. 04-50425, No. 04-50427,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 22, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court did not abuse its discretion by denying defendant's motion for an evidentiary hearing regarding whether prosecutor intentionally provoked him into moving for a mistrial because district court elicited, and accepted, prosecutor's representation that she did not discuss the issue of pornography with a witness during pretrial meeting.
|
|||||
| United States v. Hunter, No. 05-10168,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 22, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's motion to compel a putative father to provide a DNA sample, pursuant to the DNA Analysis Backlog Elimination Act of 2000, for the purpose of establishing defendant's citizenship was properly denied as not ripe because deportation proceedings had not been initiated or threatened and, thus, were not certain to be initiated.
|
|||||
| United States v. Jari, No. 05-50109,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 22, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a prosecution under 18 U.S.C.S. § 1347, where the presentence report related that defendant put together, and managed others in, a health care fraud scheme, the record supported the district court's enhancement of defendant's sentence for being a leader or organizer of the scheme.
|
|||||
| United States v. Morales-Perez, No. 05-10115,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 22, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The prisoner's conviction for possession or purchase of cocaine base for purposes of sale, in violation of Cal. Health & Safety Code § 11351.5, was not categorically a drug trafficking offense within the meaning of U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A).
|
|||||
| Whitney v. Motor Cargo, No. 05-15546,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 22, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Wilson v. Sullivan, No. 04-56565,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 22, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Yoo Kim v. Wash. State Dep't of Licensing, No. 05-35818,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 22, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
