 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| United States v. Ventura-Hernandez, No. 06-50440,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 23, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Zentmyer, No. 05-50086,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 23, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Vaquero v. Gonzales, No. 04-75036,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 23, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Vela v. Knowles, No. 06-15517,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 23, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Vicente-Sarat v. Gonzales, No. 05-74734,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 23, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Substantial evidence did not support finding that alien failed to establish past persecution because repeated beatings, sleep deprivation, water submersion, and forced ingestion of animal blood rose to level of past persecution, which entitled alien to presumption of well-founded fear of future persecution under 8 C.F.R. § 1208.13(b)(1)(B)(ii).
|
|||||
| Wilson v. Gonzales, No. 05-74953,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 23, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Substantial evidence supported denial of an alien's application for asylum based upon an adverse credibility determination when the alien provided vague and inconsistent testimony regarding an October 1998 incident. Because alien failed to establish eligibility for asylum, he necessarily failed to establish eligibility for withholding of removal.
|
|||||
| Yin v. Gonzales, No. 05-75818,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 23, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Substantial evidence did not support denial of asylum based upon adverse credibility determination with respect to alien's claim that Chinese government persecuted her by subjecting her to forced abortion because IJ's disbelief over alien's comparison of severity of harms and his findings about employment of alien and husband were speculative.
|
|||||
| Zuniga-Gonzalez v. Gonzales, No. 05-74415,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 23, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Substantial evidence supported the denial of an alien's application for asylum based on a conclusion of an IJ and the BIA that the alien did not establish past persecution or a well-founded fear of future persecution on account of being required to serve in the Nicaraguan military and avoiding conscription.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
