 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Morales v. Gonzales, No. 05-71994,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 23, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: IJ did not abuse discretion in denying motion to reopen after alien was ordered deported in absentia for failure to provide address where she could be contacted, as required by order to show cause. IJ's rejection of claim that agency should have mailed hearing notice to Guatemalan address contained on "Record of Deportable Alien" was not arbitrary.
|
|||||
| Orrellana-Barrera v. Gonzales, No. 05-76903,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 23, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Orta-Flores v. Gonzales, Nos. 05-77102, 06-70558,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 23, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: BIA did not abuse discretion in denying second motion to reopen based on ineffective assistance of counsel when alien knew of alleged ineffective assistance by December 3, 2004, but did not file a motion to reopen until April 27, 2005. Although 90-day deadline could be equitably tolled, it began to run once ineffective assistance was discovered.
|
|||||
| Pakulov v. Gonzales, No. 05-73381,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 23, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Parker v. Lewis, No. 05-17289,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 23, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Perez v. Adams, No. 06-15079,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 23, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Perez-Cos v. Gonzales, No. 05-75901,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 23, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Pinto v. Gonzales, No. 05-72822,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 23, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Ramirez-Giron v. Gonzales, No. 05-75116,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 23, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Substantial evidence supported the denial of asylum based on an IJ's finding that an alien did not have a well-founded fear of persecution in light of changed country conditions in Guatemala and because the alien's fear was too speculative. By failing to qualify for asylum, the alien necessarily failed to qualify for withholding of removal.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| Copyright© 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
