 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| United States v. Blazevich, No. 05-55298,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 23, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Brooks, No. 05-15514,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 23, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Butler, No. 06-50148,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 23, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although defendant was experiencing financial difficulty while incarcerated, there was at least some evidence in record that defendant, who possessed a bachelor of science in business management and had previously been employed as CEO of company that created educational programs for children, could be able to pay restitution amount in the future.
|
|||||
| United States v. Chavez-Barrientos, No. 06-35246,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 23, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Cruz-Escoto, No. 05-50892,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 23, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The evidence was sufficient to support defendant's conviction under 8 U.S.C.S. § 1326 where it was determined that analysis under the designated point of entry cases was inappropriate because defendant neither entered at a designated point of entry nor proceeded in a manner designated by the government. Defendant was free from official restraint.
|
|||||
| United States v. Gee, No. 06-30353,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 23, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Geyer, No. 06-10477,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 23, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Henry, No. 06-30212,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 23, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Holcomb, No. 06-30089,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 23, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A 151-month sentence for unarmed bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C.S. § 2113(a), for defendant who qualified a career offender pursuant to U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 4B1.1(b) was not unreasonable under 18 U.S.C.S. § 3553(a) despite the possibility that defendant could die in prison given his age.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
