 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Chinna v. Gonzales, No. 05-75600,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 26, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Immigration Judge's analysis of how changed country conditions affected the immigrant's specific situation was sufficiently individualized to provide substantial evidence for the conclusion that the immigrant failed to establish eligibility for asylum. It followed that he did not satisfy the more stringent standard for withholding of removal.
|
|||||
| Danyal v. Gonzales, No. 05-72424,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 26, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Immigrant presented insufficient evidence that mistreatment he suffered rose to level of persecution, or that his assailants belonged to groups Syrian government was unable or unwilling to control. Because substantial evidence supported decision to deny asylum on the merits, court did not need to address the issue of the immigrant's credibility.
|
|||||
| Delgado-Portillo v. Gonzales, No. 06-71919,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 26, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Dhillon v. Gonzales, No. 05-72162,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 26, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because the immigrant's Convention Against Torture (CAT) claim was based on the same testimony that the Immigration Judge (IJ) found not credible, and he pointed to no other evidence that he could claim the IJ should have considered in making the CAT determination, his CAT claim failed.
|
|||||
| Feltes v. Gonzales, No. 06-70089,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 26, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Gabor v. Seligmann, No. 05-17295,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 26, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Garcia v. Gonzales, No. 06-75062,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 26, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Gonzales v. Gonzales, No. 06-74426,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 26, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Gonzalez v. Gonzales, No. 06-74120,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 26, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| Copyright© 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
