 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Consumers Energy Co. v. FERC, No. 05-1166,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, January 10, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Enron Power Mktg. v. FERC, No. 05-1422,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, January 10, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Great Lakes Utils. v. FERC, No. 05-1205,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, January 10, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Holcomb v. Powell, No. 04-5216,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, January 10, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where an employee repeatedly engaged in protected activity while her work assignments were reduced, eventually performing tasks six grades below her grade and it took a substantial period of time to correct those deficiencies, the employer should not have been granted summary judgment on the retaliation claim under 42 U.S.C.S. § 2000e-16.
|
|||||
| IDACORP Energy L.P. v. FERC, No. 04-1145 Consolidated with 04-1287, 04-1288,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, January 10, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The prohibition on retroactive ratemaking by a power supplier could require amended invoices if the originals deviated from the tariff and moving "out-of-market" purchase charges out of the customer's billing category subject to a cap was not retroactive ratemaking; it simply brought the invoices in line with the tariff.
|
|||||
| In re Davy, No. 03-8520,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, January 10, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re Zambrano, No. 05-3106,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, January 10, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re Zambrano, No. 05-3106,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, January 10, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Federal prisoner was not entitled to file a second motion to vacate his 188-month prison sentence for drug conspiracy because Booker was not a new rule of constitutional law expressly made retroactive to cases on collateral review by the U.S. Supreme Court, as required by 28 U.S.C.S. § 2255.
|
|||||
| Keeley v. Small, No. 05-5369,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, January 10, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
