 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Bennett v. Chertoff, No. 04-5281,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, January 31, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Hussain v. Nicholson, No. 04-5417,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, January 31, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Title VII discrimination claim failed despite the fact that employee established a prima facie case as he failed to rebut the legitimate reason offered by employer, that other person was better suited for position. Retaliation claim failed because the employee could not show the existence of an actionable adverse action or any causal connection.
|
|||||
| In re Levi, No. 05-3032,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, January 31, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| N. Am. Catholic Educ. Programming Found. v. FCC, No. 04-1384,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, January 31, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An appeal from an FCC denial of a foundation's instructional television fixed services licensing application was dismissed because 47 U.S.C.S. § 402(b) was applicable, not 47 U.S.C.S. § 402(a), and the court lacked jurisdiction since the foundation's appeal was not filed within the 30 days set forth in 47 U.S.C.S. § 402(c).
|
|||||
| Pharm. Care Mgmt. Ass'n v. Dist. of Columbia, No. 05-7007,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, January 31, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Fonseca, No. 04-3078,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, January 31, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The Speedy Trial Act was not violated where 70 days after a mistrial was declared the government filed a pretrial motion which was not resolved until the day the retrial began; the time after the motion was filed was excluded under 18 U.S.C.S. § 3161(h)(1)(F) because § 3161(e)'s 70 days began to run the day the motion was filed, not the next day.
|
|||||
| United States v. Fonseca, No. 04-3078,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, January 31, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Wilcox v. Sisson, No. 05-7038,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, January 31, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
