 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Conn. Dep't of Pub. Util. Control v. FERC, No. 05-1411,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, February 2, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Czekalski v. Peters, No. 05-5221,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, February 2, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The grant of summary judgment to the employer on the Title VII claim was reversed because the employee had raised a genuine issue as to whether the reassignment left her with "significantly different" -- and diminished -- supervisory and programmatic responsibilities; the employee went from supervising 960 employees to fewer than 10.
|
|||||
| Guardsmark, LLC v. NLRB, No. 05-1216, Consolidated with 05-1236 and 05-1272,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, February 2, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Three work rules from a national employer of security guards for hire violated protected employee rights under § 7 of the NLRA, 29 U.S.C.S. § 157: a rule requiring employees to register their complaints only through the chain of command; a rule barring off-duty union solicitation; and a rule prohibiting on- or off-duty fraternization with clients.
|
|||||
| Guardsmark, LLC v. NLRB, No. 05-1216 Consolidated with 05-1236 and 05-1272,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, February 2, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re Raines, No. 07-1011,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, February 2, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re Spencer, No. 07-1024,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, February 2, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| N.C. Utils. Comm'n v. FERC, No. 05-1339,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, February 2, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A state utilities commission's petition was denied because its argument that a FERC order had to be remanded with instructions to provide a revenue credit for the customers of a pipeline was premised on a misapprehension of the facts; the pipeline was not leasing or renting its right-of-way to a former affiliate.
|
|||||
| Role Models Am., Inc. v. Penmar Dev. Corp., No. 05-5421,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, February 2, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
