LexisNexis
  

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   Federal Courts - DC Circuit Court and Court of Appeals - March 2, 2006

  
In re Socialist People's Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, No. 05-5458, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, March 2, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Johnson v. Johnson, No. 05-5318, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, March 2, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Judd v. United States Dist. Court, No. 05-5356, 05-5391, 05-5453, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, March 2, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Murchison v. Murchison, No. 04-7137, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, March 2, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: The district court's denial of damages to an ERISA plan participant was affirmed because the fiduciary was liable only to the ERISA plan under 29 U.S.C.S. § 1109(a); but, the district court's refusal to order the fiduciary to repay any plan losses that were the result of his prohibited transactions was reversed and remanded pursuant to § 1109(a).

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Mwabira-Simera v. Sodexho Marriot Mgmt. Servs., No. 05-7116 Consolidated with 05-7117, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, March 2, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Newby v. Bush, No. 05-5457, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, March 2, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Pugh v. Socialist People's Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, No. 05-7122, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, March 2, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Regent Assisted Living, Inc. v. NLRB, No. 05-1185 Consolidated with No. 05-1228, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, March 2, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: An assisted living center's petition for review was denied, and the NLRB's cross-application for enforcement was granted because the NLRB did not err in failing to set aside an election because of a union's alleged violation of § 8(g) of the NLRA, 29 U.S.C.S. § 158(g).

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Rivera v. United States, No. 05-5407, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, March 2, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Smith v. District of Columbia, No. 05-7136, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, March 2, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: District of Columbia, its public schools, and a superintendent were granted summary affirmance because the parents did not present clear and convincing evidence of a court order violation or legal authority supporting a claim that the District, schools, and superintendent were legally bound by representations they made in a spreadsheet of payments.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

  www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us
  CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.