 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Lora v. DOJ, No. 05-5147,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, March 7, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Messina v. Krakower, No. 04-7163,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, March 7, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In business owner's defamation suit against attorney and law firm, district court properly held that judicial proceedings privilege applied to letter that attorney wrote on behalf of business partner who had dispute with owner where it was plain on face of letter that it was preliminary to a judicial proceeding and was an attempt at settlement.
|
|||||
| Mueller v. England, No. 05-5396,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, March 7, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Muir v. Navy Fed. Credit Union, No. 05-7128,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, March 7, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| NRDC v. EPA, No. 04-1438,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, March 7, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Environmental organization lacked Article III standing in action challenging EPA's rule. There was nothing to organization's assertion that members were now required to add to precautions they already took against exposure to sunlight; given probabilities, extra precautions in response to EPA's rule would have been irrational.
|
|||||
| Nat'l Air Traffic Controllers' Ass'n v. FLRA, No. 05-1410,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, March 7, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Nichols v. Billington, No. 05-5326,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, March 7, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Rattler v. Dep't of Labor, No. 05-5203,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, March 7, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Inmate's motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis was denied, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.S. § 1915(g). While incarcerated, the inmate brought at least three civil actions or appeals that were dismissed on grounds that they were frivolous, malicious, or failed to state claim, and the inmate made no allegation of imminent danger.
|
|||||
| Rogers v. Hastings, No. 05-5317,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, March 7, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
