 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Gale v. MCI, Inc., No. 06-7123,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, March 7, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Illinois ex rel. Madigan v. FERC, No. 06-1234,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, March 7, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re Glover, No. 06-5247,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, March 7, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Martin v. Howard Univ., No. 06-7157,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, March 7, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant in a civil appeal was required to direct billing concerns regarding court reporter charges to the proper district court under 28 U.S.C.S. § 753, rather than the appellate court, and a motion to correct trial transcripts also should have been filed with the district court pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 10(e)(1).
|
|||||
| Mittal Steel USA ISG, Inc. v. Bodman, No. 06-5227,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, March 7, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Ruther v. Auto Nation Inc., No. 06-7099,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, March 7, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Ruther v. Makanda, No. 06-7097,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, March 7, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Ruther v. United States VA, No. 06-5189,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, March 7, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Camara, No. 05-3068,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, March 7, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's conviction on conspiracy and numerous fraud charges was affirmed because, in light of the Hudson decision, he abandoned his claim that the district court should have granted his motion to dismiss, and the district court acted within its discretion in allowing a special agent's summary testimony.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
