 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Bailey v. Potter, No. 05-5454,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, March 9, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because a district court did not issue the appropriate order pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a) dismissing the complaint, it continued to have jurisdiction over plaintiff's motion to enforce the parties' settlement agreement, and because a Rule 58 dismissal order was never filed, plaintiff's time to appeal never began and her appeal was timely.
|
|||||
| Cent. Vt. Pub. Serv. Corp. v. FERC, No. 06-1021 Consolidated with 06-1119,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, March 9, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Hoai v. Superior Court for the Dist. of Columbia, No. 06-7182,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, March 9, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Hoai v. Superior Court for the Dist. of Columbia, No. 06-7182,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, March 9, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re Moore, No. 06-5428,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, March 9, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re Smith Bagley, Inc., No. 06-1379,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, March 9, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| McGann v. Suter, No. 06-5359,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, March 9, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| N. Baja Pipeline, LLC v. FERC, No. 05-1214,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, March 9, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Under 5 U.S.C.S. § 706(2)(A) of the Administrative Procedures Act, FERC reasonably rejected a natural gas pipeline company's proposed cost-sharing formula for force majeure events that unexpectedly interrupted service because the proposal overly favored the company at the expense of shippers; scheduled maintenance was not a force majeure event.
|
|||||
| NSTAR Elec. & Gas Corp. v. FERC, No. 05-1362, Consolidated with 05-1363,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, March 9, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although FERC reasonably waived a 60-day notice requirement for changes to filed rates in the wholesale price of electricity during local transmission shortages in New England, it failed to satisfy 16 U.S.C.S. § 824e(a) because a gap in cost data made it impossible to determine whether the filed rates adopted in mitigation agreements were just.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
