 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Patent Office v. FLRA, No. 05-1173,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, March 21, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court lacked jurisdiction pursuant to 5 U.S.C.S. § 7123(a)(1) to review a petition filed by a federal government employees' union, seeking to reinstate an arbitration award set aside by the Federal Labor Relations Authority (FLRA), because the FLRA's arbitration decision plainly did not involve a statutory unfair labor practice.
|
|||||
| Plotzker v. Am. Bd. of Urology, No. 05-7155,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, March 21, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying appellant's second Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. Most of appellant's claims were or could have been raised in his first Rule 60(b) motions, filed in 2000.
|
|||||
| United States v. Wilson, No. 05-3186,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, March 21, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Waters v. Gonzales, No. 05-5329,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, March 21, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant failed to show that the proffered reasons for the failure to promote her to the position of supervisory paralegal--that the selectee had better performance evaluations and had garnered more favorable reviews from coworkers--were pretextual, and that a reasonable trier of fact could infer intentional discrimination based on the evidence.
|
|||||
| Wolf v. CIA, No. 05-5394,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, March 21, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
