 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| In re Badru, No. 06-3001, 06-3006,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, March 22, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Constellation Energy Commodities Group, Inc. v. FERC, No. 02-1367, Consolidated with 03-1285, 05-1094, 05-1154,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, March 23, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Facchina Constr. Co. v. NLRB, No. 04-1429, Consolidated with 05-1031,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, March 23, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Kennecott Greens Creek Mining Co. v. MSHA, No. 01-1046, Consolidated with 01-1124, 01-1146, 05-1197, Consolidated with 05-1255, 05-1291, 05-1296, 05-1311, 05-1312, 05-1314,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, March 23, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Paracha v. Rumsfeld, No. 06-1038,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, March 23, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Am. Ass'n of Paging Carriers v. FCC, No. 04-1359,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, March 24, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Denial of a motion for reconsideration of a decision of the Federal Communications Commission was not reviewable on appeal under 5 U.S.C.S. § 701(a)(2) because the agency did not reopen its original decision, and the fact that a trade association did not participate in rule-making was not dispositive because its members could have.
|
|||||
| Roth v. King, No. 05-7060, Consolidated with 05-7061, 05-7062, 05-7063, 05-7089,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, March 24, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Motion to strike a motion to remand was denied, where, although appellees/cross-appellants did not demonstrate "good cause" for their failure to comply with the court's time limit for filing dispositive motions, the motion to remand raised a jurisdictional question that the court was obligated to consider even if not raised by the parties.
|
|||||
| S. Cal. Edison Co. v. FERC, No. 04-1396,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, March 24, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: FERC acted neither arbitrarily nor capriciously under § 210 of the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978, 16 U.S.C.S. § 824a-3 in adhering to its conclusion in a prior case that the LLC's extraction and transportation activities were not part of the auxiliary load in assessing brine extraction while treating brine reinjection differently.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
