 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Byrne v. AMTRAK, No. 05-7082,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, March 31, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Garcia v. Johanns, Nos. 04-5448 and 05-5002,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, March 31, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court of appeals affirmed district court's judgment finding that Hispanic farmers who sued USDA, claiming that programs it created to loan money to farmers violated the Equal Credit Opportunity Act and were racially discriminatory, failed to show questions of fact or law common to a class that warranted class certification under Fed. R. Civ. P. 23.
|
|||||
| Gasser v. District of Columbia, No. 04-7018, Consolidated with 04-7024,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, March 31, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where a police officer taking a blood thinner was placed on limited duty due to an increased risk of trauma-associated bleeding, the District of Columbia was entitled to judgment as a matter of law regarding the ADA claim because he presented insufficient evidence that his disability, if any, substantially limited his ability to work.
|
|||||
| Kaseman v. District of Columbia, No. 05-7016,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, March 31, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where appellees prevailed under the IDEA and were awarded attorney's fees for the administrative and judicial proceedings, the awards were subject to a single application of the fee cap provision of the District of Columbia Appropriations Act because the administrative and judicial proceedings together comprised a single "action."
|
|||||
| Martinez v. Bureau of Prisons, No. 04-5343,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, March 31, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The government's arguments that the court lacked jurisdiction were meritless. The district court's dismissal of a pro se federal inmate's Privacy Act, FOIA, and Due Process Clause complaint was affirmed because, inter alia, FOIA did not entitle the inmate to have copies of his presentence reports.
|
|||||
| Martinez v. Bureau of Prisons, No. 04-5343,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, March 31, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Progressive Elec., Inc. v. NLRB, No. 05-1127 Consolidated with 05-1157,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, March 31, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Ponds, No. 03-3134 Consolidated with 03-3135,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, March 31, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| Copyright© 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
