 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Gilmore v. FCC, No. 05-1413,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, April 3, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Imposition of corporate account administrative fee by mobile service provider did not violate the Communications Act because relevant market was competitive and administration fee was not unjust or unreasonable under 47 U.S.C.S. § 201(b). There was no requirement that provider's charges be tied to specific costs in order to satisfy § 201(b).
|
|||||
| United States v. Alberto-Genao, No. 05-3034,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, April 3, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| San Manuel Indian Bingo & Casino v. NLRB, No. 05-1392 Consolidated with 05-1432,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, April 4, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
