 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. SEC, No. 05-1240,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, April 7, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court of appeals found that SEC violated 5 U.S.C.S. § 553 when it reconsidered and upheld a rule which required mutual funds that relied on Exemptive Rules to have no less than 75 percent of directors who were independent because it relied on cost estimates for implementing the rule without giving U.S. Chamber of Commerce an opportunity to comment.
|
|||||
| In re James, No. 05-5132,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, April 7, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re James, No. 05-5132,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, April 7, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Employees were not entitled to interlocutory appeal of denial of class certification under Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(f) because issues raised related to whether the employees met the Title VII filing deadlines, not to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(f)'s certification requirements. Thus, they were beyond the purpose of Rule 23(f) review.
|
|||||
| United States v. Ginyard, No. 05-3003 Consolidated with Nos. 05-3004, 05-3025, 05-3035,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, April 7, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: On appeal from a drug-related conviction, the judgment was reversed because the district court abused its discretion in dismissing a holdout juror under Fed. R. Crim. P. 23(b). The district court failed in its duty of inquiry, and the record did not support a finding of good cause necessitating dismissal.
|
|||||
| Cobell v. Norton, No. 05-5388,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, April 10, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Detroit Newspaper Agency v. NLRB, No. 04-1366 Consolidated with 04-1403,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, April 10, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Detroit Newspaper Agency v. NLRB, No. 04-1366 Consolidated with 04-1403,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, April 10, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Miranda v. Gonzales, No. 05-5066,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, April 10, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Baugham, No. 03-3157 Consolidated with 03-3158,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, April 10, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
