 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| United States v. Douglas, No. 05-3027,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, April 13, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a prosecution for possessing with intent to distribute five grams or more of crack cocaine, defendant's prior arrest for the same offense 15 months earlier was properly admitted under Fed. R. Evid. 404(b) as relevant to prove intent, as only one arresting officer saw the drug in defendant's possession before he abandoned it during a foot chase.
|
|||||
| United States v. Watson, No. 04-3082 & 04-3090,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, April 13, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's conviction for violating 18 U.S.C.S. §§ 844(e) and 1361 was affirmed because his argument that the Batson rule should be extended to the blind failed; but, the case was remanded for resentencing because the district court failed to appreciate the sentencing authority that it retained after the Booker decision.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
