 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Am. Orient Express Ry. Co., LLC v. Surface Transp. Bd., No. 06-1077, Consolidated with 06-1080, No. 06-1203,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, April 20, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An excursion company's petition was denied because the Surface Transportation Board correctly found that the company was subject to its jurisdiction, and the Railroad Retirement Board correctly found that the company was liable for contributions under the Railroad Retirement Act and the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act.
|
|||||
| Conn. Dep't of Pub. Util. Control v. FERC, No. 05-1411,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, April 20, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A petition for review was granted, and the matter was remanded to FERC because FERC abandoned its earlier basis for authority and argued, on appeal, that § 201 of the Federal Power Act permitted it to regulate generation resource adequacy because of its effect on interstate electricity transmission.
|
|||||
| Plotzker v. Am. Bd. of Urology, No. 06-7197,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, April 20, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The motions for summary affirmance filed by a university and a medical board were granted because the merits of the parties' positions were so clear as to warrant summary action; a district court did not abuse its discretion in denying a doctor's third Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion.
|
|||||
| Plotzker v. Am. Bd. of Urology, No. 06-7197,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, April 20, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Bras, No. 05-3190,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, April 20, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The 37-month sentence of a company supervisor who led a conspiracy to defraud the District of Columbia by falsifying costs of supplying asphalt by bribing District employees was upheld; defendant's offense level was properly increased under USSG § 3B1.1(a) because, although he did not originate the conspiracy, it flourished under his leadership.
|
|||||
| Whitehead v. Warner Bros., Inc., No. 00-7163,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, April 20, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Abdulzaher v. Gates, No. 07-1031,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, April 23, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Makkar, No. 07-3020,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, April 23, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Zalita v. Bush, No. 07-5129,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, April 23, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
