 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Borset v. Librarian of Cong., No. 05-1379,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, May 23, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because none of the challenged orders, disposing of appellant's claim for royalties under the Audio Home Recording Act of 1992 were issued by an arbitration panel or as a result of a proceeding by Copyright Royalty Judges, the court of appeals lacked jurisdiction to review such orders, 17 U.S.C.S. §§ 803(d)(1), 802(g).
|
|||||
| Duckett v. District of Columbia, No. 05-7131,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, May 23, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Guard Publ. Co. v. NLRB, No. 05-1306 Consolidated with 05-1361,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, May 23, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Hill v. Fed. Judicial Ctr., No. 05-5412,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, May 23, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re Fashina, No. 06-3002,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, May 23, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re Sealed Case, No. 04-3015,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, May 23, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Since there was no merit in defendant's arguments that his sentence ran afoul of 18 U.S.C.S. § 3553(a), Booker, and his due process rights, he did not establish that it was imposed in violation of law under 18 U.S.C.S. § 3742(a)(1) and, since his arguments regarding his guilty-plea conviction also failed, his conviction and sentence were affirmed.
|
|||||
| Judd v. United States, No. 05-5289 Consolidated with 05-5290,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, May 23, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Judd v. United States, No. 05-5289 Consolidated with 05-5290,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, May 23, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Lightfoot v. District of Columbia, No. 05-7028,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, May 23, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Since the District of Columbia Government Comprehensive Merit Personnel Act of 1978 and District of Columbia Court of Appeals decisions provided ample standards to satisfy the former District of Columbia employee's due process claim, the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the employees on their due process claim was reversed.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
