 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Cannon v. United States, No. 06-5051,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, June 5, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Mondie v. IRS, No. 04-5410,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, June 5, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Rivera v. United States, No. 05-5407,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, June 5, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Apotex, Inc. v. FDA, No. 06-5105,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, June 6, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: FDA's denial of preliminary injunction in favor of generic drug manufacturer was affirmed, as manufacturer had little likelihood of succeeding on merits. Reasonable propositions adequately supported FDA's position that estoppel-based approach to court decision trigger of exclusivity period for marketing product without competition was ill advised.
|
|||||
| Apotex, Inc. v. FDA, No. 06-5105,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, June 6, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Hill v. Fed. Judicial Ctr., No. 05-5412,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, June 6, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Public Citizen, Inc. v. Nat'l Highway Traffic Safety Admin., No. 05-1188, 05-1265, 05-1294, 05-1309, 05-1391,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, June 6, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Dawson, No. 04-3128,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, June 6, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court did not abuse its discretion in granting motion to exclude expert testimony offered by defendant charged with violating 18 U.S.C.S. § 922(g)(1); testimony was to effect that defendant had no memory of carrying ammunition, but he failed to explain that he was using "blackout" to mean special brain dysfunction, rather than intoxicated.
|
|||||
| Cinergy Mktg. & Trading, L.P. v. FERC, No. 04-1168 Consolidated with 04-1170, 04-1188, 04-1235, 04-1237, 04-1238,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, June 7, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
