 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| City of Dania Beach v. FAA, No. 05-1328,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, May 11, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: FAA's letter adopting new runway use procedures at a local airport was set aside because agency adopted procedures without engaging in the environment review process required by 42 U.S.C.S. § 4332 of National Environmental Policy Act and 49 U.S.C.S. § 303(c) of Transportation Act and also failed to follow agency's own environmental review policies.
|
|||||
| In re Fashina, No. 06-3002,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, May 11, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An inmate's petition for leave to file a second or successive 28 U.S.C.S. § 2255 petition, asserting that his sentence was illegal under Booker, was denied since Booker was not retroactively applicable on collateral review; Booker did not announce either a substantive rule or a watershed procedural rule.
|
|||||
| Mueller v. Winter, No. 05-5396,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, May 11, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although ratings in supplemental fitness report for lieutenant commander were different from those in original, they were still judgments, and there was no way to determine whether inaccuracies reporting senior discerned were errors of fact or opinion; thus, challenge to refusal to remove original report under Privacy Act failed.
|
|||||
| Nat'l Ass'n of Mfrs. v. OSHA, No. 06-1122,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, May 11, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because the addition of five new substances to the list of toxic and hazardous substances did not modify OSHA's Hazard Communication Standard, a petition for review of OSHA's order amending the list was untimely filed under 29 U.S.C.S. § 655(f) in that the Standard had remained unchanged in relevant respects for almost 20 years.
|
|||||
| Transcon. Gas Pipe Line Corp. v. FERC, No. 04-1234 Consolidated with 06-1143,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, May 11, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: At time of petitioner's contract with intervenor, FERC had authority to regulate gathering services and authority to order petitioner to pay compensation for terminating those services in violation of contract; FERC's reimbursement order did not regulate provision of gathering services by petitioner's affiliate to which petitioner sold facilities.
|
|||||
| Transmission Agency v. FERC, No. 05-1402 Consolidated with 06-1246,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, May 11, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Johnson, No. 04-3096,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, May 11, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Sanders, No. 05-3133, Consolidated with No. 05-3155,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, May 11, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's convictions were reversed, and the case was remanded with instructions to dismiss the indictments because, in light of the Zedner decision, defendants' Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C.S. § 3161 et seq., were violated; an excessive number of excludable days had elapsed before their trial began.
|
|||||
| We the People Found., Inc. v. United States, No. 05-5359,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, May 11, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
