 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Andrews v. Suter, No. 05-5342,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, June 19, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant's motion for recusal was denied because he failed to show that appellate court's impartiality might reasonably be questioned under 28 U.S.C.S. § 455(a); appellant was also ordered to show cause why in forma pauperis status on appeal should not be revoked under three-strikes provision of 28 U.S.C.S. § 1915(g).
|
|||||
| Demos v. Comm'r, No. 05-1324,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, June 19, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Inmate who had "three strikes" for having at least three prior civil actions or appeals dismissed as frivolous, malicious, or for failure to state a claim was not entitled to proceed in forma pauperis in suit against Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service because inmate failed to show that he met exception provided in 28 U.S.C.S. § 1915(g).
|
|||||
| In re McLendon, No. 06-3014,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, June 19, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re Murray, No. 06-5050,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, June 19, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: It appeared that inmate's mandamus petition was predicated on civil claims that were subject to filing fee requirements of PLRA, 28 U.S.C.S. § 1915(g). Inmate had, while incarcerated, filed at least three civil actions or appeals that were dismissed as frivolous, malicious, or for failure to state claim upon which relief might be granted.
|
|||||
| In re Razzoli, No. 06-5049,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, June 19, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re Shines, No. 06-7034,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, June 19, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re Stanley, No. 06-5046,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, June 19, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Judd v. Lappin, No. 06-8001,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, June 19, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| McKee v. United States Parole Comm'n, No. 05-5481,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, June 19, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
