 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Abbott Labs. v. Andrx Pharms., Inc., 06-1101,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 5, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Preliminary injunction against alleged patent infringer was affirmed in a case related to clarithromycin because collateral estoppel did not apply, i.e., determination made in a preliminary injunction hearing was not sufficiently final to be afforded preclusive effect, and district court did not abuse discretion in finding likelihood of success.
|
|||||
| Padgett v. Nicholson, 2006-7037,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 5, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: When a veteran died after his case was submitted for decision, but before the opinion issued, the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, a U.S. Const. art. I court, had authority to issue a judgment nunc pro tunc as of the time of his death. Under the facts, the surviving spouse, as accrued-benefits claimant, could be substituted on his appeal.
|
|||||
| Aero Prods. Int'l, Inc. v. Intex Rec. Corp., 05-1283,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 8, 2007, Decided , January 8, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Amini Innovation Corp. v. Anthony Cal., Inc., 06-1096, -1129,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 8, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Finding that dresser did not infringe design patent for dresser with stylistic characteristics was improper, since distinguishing individual elements of dressers did not preclude ordinary observer from confusing dressers as wholes, and any existing style which influenced design patent did not preclude novel interpretation of such style.
|
|||||
| Gtech Corp. v. Sci. Games Int'l, Inc., 2006-1340,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 8, 2007, Decided , January 8, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Hunt Bldg. Co. v. Winter, 06-1125,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 8, 2007, Decided , January 8, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Schleicher Cmty. Corr. Ctr., Inc. v. Gonzales, 2006-1215,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 8, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Since quantum issues were outstanding, the Board of Contract Appeals' original decision regarding the claim for Contract Disputes Act (CDA) interest was not final, and Board was free to reexamine the issue in light of intervening case law. Since the contractor served as little more than a conduit, it was not entitled to 41 U.S.C.S. § 611 interest.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
