Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free! Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free! While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
	Federal Courts - Federal Circuit Court of Appeals - January 10, 2006
	Aspex Eyewear, Inc. v. Miracle Optics, Inc., 04-1265, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 10, 2006, Decided View this case - free   Overview: Patent holder's licensing of a non-party was held, on appeal, not to constitute a complete assignment of rights to sue for infringement, where the term of the license was shorter than the term of the patent. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Kidwell v. Nicholson, 05-7167, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 10, 2006, Decided View this case - free   Overview: A claimant seeking an award of veterans benefits was denied a writ of mandamus and required to pursue the ordinary appellate process with respect to his claim for an earlier date of service connection. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Timken United States Corp. v. United States, 05-1158, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 10, 2006, Decided View this case - free   Overview: The Court of International Trade did not commit error by remanding a case to the Department of Commerce to consider an importer's corrections to sales data, nor by affirming Commerce's decision to disregard the proffered corrections and to impose an antidumping duty, as the decision was supported by substantial evidence, under 19 U.S.C.S. § 1516a. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Union Carbide Chems. & Plastics Tech. Corp. v. Shell Oil Co., 04-1475, 04-1512, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 10, 2006, Decided View this case - free   Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Back to Top
	www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us   CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.