 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Aldrich v. OPM, 05-3295,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 11, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Petitioner's situation fit within 5 C.F.R. § 838.802(a): she was attempting to obtain survivor benefits by virtue of a divorce-related court order. Since her divorce occurred prior to May 7, 1985, the effective date of the Spouse Equity Act of 1984, Pub. L. No. 98-615, 98 Stat. 3195, there was no statutory basis for awarding her survivor benefits.
|
|||||
| Donoghue v. United States Postal Serv., 05-3284,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 11, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Petitioner was denied relief where the decision removing him from the U.S. Postal Service for opening an undeliverable letter, in violation 39 U.S.C.S. § 3623(d), was based on substantial circumstantial evidence, under 5 U.S.C.S. § 7703.
|
|||||
| Dureiko v. United States, 05-5023,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 11, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Fagergren v. DOI, 05-3315,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 11, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board (Board) denying law enforcement officer enhanced retirement benefits was affirmed, as the petitioner was primarily a National Park ranger, and the Board's decision was supported by substantial evidence and not arbitrary or capricious, under 5 U.S.C.S. § 7703(c).
|
|||||
| Fernand v. Dep't of the Treasury, 06-3082,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 11, 2006, Decided , January 11, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Hanford v. United States, 05-5043,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 11, 2006, Decided , January 11, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re Reiter, 06-1113,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 11, 2006, Decided , January 11, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Leonardo v. United States, 05-5103,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 11, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: There was no error in the decision of the Court of Federal Claims that an artist failed to establish the existence of a bailment contract with the government relating to the storage of her artwork at the American Cultural Center in Brussels. Nor was there legal error because ratification had to be based on a demonstrated acceptance of a contract.
|
|||||
| Levinsky v. DOJ, 06-3046,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 11, 2006, Decided , January 11, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
