 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Curtis v. United States, 2006-5107,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 10, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: United States Court of Federal Claims properly dismissed breach-of-contract that sounded in tort because it lacked jurisdiction to hear tort claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C.S. § 1491(a), and it also properly dismissed claims against defendants other than the United States.
|
|||||
| In re Wheatley, 2006-1400,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 10, 2007, Decided , January 10, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re Wright, 06-1449,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 10, 2007, Decided , January 10, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Janssen Pharmaceutica N.V. v. Mylan Pharms., Inc., 2007-1100,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 10, 2007, Decided , January 10, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Lodestar v. Austin Nichols & Co., 2006-1388,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 10, 2007, Decided , January 10, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Melton v. HHS, 2006-3346,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 10, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where settlement agreement between a former federal employee and the federal agency for which she worked was silent about whether the agency could or could not collect a debt that the employee owed, the agency properly pursued recovery of the debt. Based on the language of the agreement, agency did not agree to waive its right to collect the debt.
|
|||||
| Parker v. Microsoft Corp., 2007-1017,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 10, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Quest Med., Inc. v. Acclarent, Inc., 2006-1483,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 10, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Shanghai Meihao Elec., Inc. v. Leviton Mfg. Co., 2006-1272, 2006-1488,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 10, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Patents at issue related to a reset lockout feature in a circuit interrupting device. Reviewed without deference, the district court's claim construction was upheld. Permanent injunction issued by the district court against the patent owner was reversed, as it failed to set forth the reasons for its issuance, Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(d).
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
