 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Albert v. Nicholson, 06-7045,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 12, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Am. Floor Consultants & Installations, Inc. v. United States, 2006-5084,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 12, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Beene v. Nicholson, 2006-7237,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 12, 2007, Decided , January 12, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Berger v. Rossignol Ski Co., 2006-1431,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 12, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| E-Pass Techs., Inc. v. 3Com Corp., 20, 06-1356, 06-1357, 06-1358,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 12, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Users of personal digital assistant (PDA) products did not infringe a patent for a method and device for substituting a single electronic multi-function card for multiple credit cards, since the accused devices did not constitute cards and there was no showing that any PDA practiced the method by performing the claimed steps in order.
|
|||||
| Kostishak v. MSPB, 2006-3280,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 12, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where a former federal employee's claim was that he should have been entitled to a refund of insurance premiums withheld pursuant to the Federal Employees' Group Life Insurance Act, under 5 U.S.C.S. § 8715, jurisdiction was with the district courts or the United States Court of Federal Claims and not with the Merit Systems Protection Board.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
