 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Brent v. DOJ, 06-3153,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 16, 2007, Decided , January 16, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Fire-Trol Holdings, LLC v. United States, 06-5027,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 16, 2007, Decided , January 16, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Furminator, Inc. v. Ontel Prods. Corp., 2006-1355,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 16, 2007, Decided , January 16, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Jones v. United States Postal Serv., 2007-3054,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 16, 2007, Decided , January 16, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Martin v. MSPB, 2006-3270,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 16, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: MSPB properly dismissed employee's appeal from his removal for lack of jurisdiction under 5 U.S.C.S. § 7511(a)(1)(B) because he was employed in the position for four months, there was a break of more than one workday between that job and a similar position, and, thus, he was not in current continuous service in same or similar position for a year.
|
|||||
| Pate v. Nicholson, 2006-7325,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 16, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Claimant's appeal was dismissed because whether she was a valid spouse of a veteran was a question of fact over which the court lacked jurisdiction, under 38 U.S.C.S. § 7292(d)(2). The issue also did not involve the interpretation of a statute or regulation, and the claimant otherwise failed to state a claim over which the court had jurisdiction.
|
|||||
| Smart v. MSPB, 2006-3283,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 16, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where a former federal employee alleged that he was terminated in violation of the Whistleblower Protection Act for disclosing that an evaluation test, which the employee failed, was invalid, dismissal of the employee's appeal was proper since the disclosure was made during grievance proceedings rather than separately to the employing agency.
|
|||||
| Tavarez v. OPM, 2006-3394,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 16, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Theus v. DOT, 06-3141,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 16, 2007, Decided , January 16, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
