 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Cayat v. Nicholson, 05-7156,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 17, 2006, Decided , January 17, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Ciancanelli v. Dep't of Homeland Sec., 05-3154,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 17, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Former federal air marshal's removal from service was upheld where the record contained substantial evidence to support the administrative judge's determination that he knew that letters he provided from his bank regarding the reasons for bounced checks in paying back a government credit card were false.
|
|||||
| Greenlee v. United States Postal Serv., 05-3343,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 17, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Merit Systems Protection Board properly dismissed an individual's appeal for lack of jurisdiction where he failed to identify any rule, law, or regulation that authorized a direct appeal to the Board as to the United States Postal Service's failure to offer him a job. Moreover, an appeal of his removal 12 years ago was untimely.
|
|||||
| Lamps Plus, Inc. v. Dolan, 04-1559, 05-1218,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 17, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Jury verdict of patent infringement by the lamp manufacturers was upheld where the trial court properly construed the terms "hollow cylinder" and "affixed to and extending from" and substantial evidence showed that the infringement was direct and willful. Substantial evidence also supported the jury's rejection of the manufacturers' counterclaims.
|
|||||
| Rodrick v. OPM, 05-3274,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 17, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Office of Personnel Management properly denied a former employee's application for an annuity under the Civil Service Retirement System where, inter alia, his three temporary appointments did not fall under 5 C.F.R. § 831.201(a)(1) and there was no evidence that a promotion was a career appointment or granted him competitive status.
|
|||||
| Saab Cars USA, Inc. v. United States, 04-1268, 04-1416,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 17, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: United States Court of International Trade's decision affirming the denial of an importer's protests concerning duty allowances for defective imported automobiles was affirmed as the lower court had properly considered the evidence before it under the preponderance of the evidence standard.
|
|||||
| Sapien v. MSPB, 05-3251,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 17, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Merit Systems Protection Board's decision dismissing an employee's appeal of his removal for excessive unauthorized absences and failure to report an unplanned absence as untimely was upheld where the employee failed to show that he was incapacitated from filing an appeal during the entire 14-year delay.
|
|||||
| Stern v. Trs. of Columbia Univ., 05-1291,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 17, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court properly granted a university and inventor summary judgment on an individual's claim that he should have been named as a coinventor where the individual simply carried out an experiment previously done by the inventor on animals that the inventor had already determined would be good models for prostaglandins research.
|
|||||
| Williams v. OPM, 05-3330,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 17, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Merit Systems Protection Board's conclusion that a former employee was not entitled to retirement credit for the period of his separation from service during which he did not receive Office of Workers' Compensation Programs benefits was affirmed as 5 C.F.R. § 353.107 could not be read to require otherwise.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
