 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Benjamin v. OPM, 06-3044,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 18, 2006, Decided , January 18, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Brown v. Dep't of Homeland Sec., 06-3037,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 18, 2006, Decided , January 18, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Cent. Mfg. Co. v. Hepa Corp., 05-1566,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 18, 2006, Decided , January 18, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Dunne v. OPM, 05-3271,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 18, 2006, Decided , January 18, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Eolas Techs., Inc. v. Microsoft Corp., MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET NO. 811,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 18, 2006, Decided , January 18, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where rules of a district court and its normal appellate court required reassignment of a case upon remand for new trial, but the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit which ordered the remand of a patent case had no similar rule, the certified question of whether reassignment was required was appropriate for immediate review.
|
|||||
| French v. United States Postal Serv., 06-3102,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 18, 2006, Decided , January 18, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Gajete v. OPM, 05-3354,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 18, 2006, Decided , January 18, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Gardiner, Kamya & Assocs., P.C. v. Jackson, 05-1160,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 18, 2006, Decided , January 18, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Griffin v. MSPB, 05-3337,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 18, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Merit Systems Protection Board's dismissal of an employee's appeal of a decision removing him from his position as untimely filed was vacated because the Board had erred in considering whether there was good cause for the employee's delay without first determining the length of that delay.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| Copyright© 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
