Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free! Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free! While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
	Federal Courts - Federal Circuit Court of Appeals - January 19 - January 20, 2006
	Fuji Photo Film Co. v. ITC, 04-1618, 05-1274, 05-1254, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 19, 2006, Decided , January 19, 2006, Filed View this case - free   Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	In re Gerdes GmbH, MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET NO. 800, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 19, 2006, Decided , January 19, 2006, Filed View this case - free   Overview: Where foreign entities' petition for a writ of mandamus was erroneously denied on procedural grounds, rehearing was granted to vacate the order denying the petition, but the entities failed to show a clear and indisputable right to the writ to compel the International Trade Commission to complete an investigation despite withdrawal of a complaint. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Jacobs Eng'g Group, Inc. v. United States, 05-5052, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 19, 2006, Decided View this case - free   Overview: In reversing the lower court's decision, the appeals court held that when the government terminated the parties' contract, it was required to reimburse the contractor for all of its costs incurred up to that point and not only for 80 percent of them; the court concluded that "all costs reimbursable" defined the type of costs, not the amount. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Lippolis v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd., 05-3282, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 19, 2006, Decided View this case - free   Overview: Where a federal employee received a removal notice but his representative did not receive the notice until approximately two weeks later due to an address error, the employee's appeal of the removal was untimely after the employee's receipt of the notice which expressly set out the time limit for filing an appeal. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Judd v. United States, 06-5025, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 20, 2006, Decided , January 20, 2006, Filed View this case - free   Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Shope v. MSPB, 06-3018, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 20, 2006, Decided , January 20, 2006, Filed View this case - free   Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Thomas v. Nicholson, 05-7195, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 20, 2006, Decided , January 20, 2006, Filed View this case - free   Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Back to Top
	www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us   Copyright© 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.