LexisNexis
  

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   Federal Courts - Federal Circuit Court of Appeals - January 24 - January 25, 2006

  
Applied Med. Res. Corp. v. United States Surgical Corp., 05-1149, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 24, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Because the district court did not err in not applying collateral estoppel to the reasonable royalty rate, substantial evidence supported the jury's verdict of willful infringement, and the district court did not abuse its discretion in admitting evidence regarding a prior litigation, the judgment of willful patent infringement was affirmed.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Depalma v. Nike, Inc., 05-1140, 05-1176, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 24, 2006, Decided , January 24, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Ahearn v. United States Postal Serv., 05-3377, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 25, 2006, Decided , January 25, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Balagtas v. MSPB, 06-3085, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 25, 2006, Decided , January 25, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Carpenter v. Nicholson, 06-7009, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 25, 2006, Decided , January 25, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Energizer Holdings v. ITC, 05-1018, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 25, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Where claims of a patent for a battery cell referred to "said zinc anode," the claim language, "an anode gel comprised of zinc as the active anode component," was by implication the antecedent basis for "said zinc anode," and thus there was no basis for a finding of patent invalidity on the ground of indefiniteness under 35 U.S.C.S. § 112, para. 2.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Gossage v. OPM, 05-3155, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 25, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Inter alia, remand was appropriate, for determination of whether the Office of Personnel Management's (OPM) decision was an appealable constructive negative suitability determination and, if so, whether OPM's decision was supported by substantial evidence. The Board erred in holding that collateral estoppel resolved this issue.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Koepnick Med. & Educ. Research Found. v. Alcon Labs., Inc., 05-1215, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 25, 2006, Decided , January 25, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Microstrategy Inc. v. Bus. Objects, S.A., 04-1572, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 25, 2006, Decided , January 25, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Minebea Co. v. Think Outside, Inc., 05-1201, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 25, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Claims themselves provide substantial guidance as to the meaning of particular claim terms. In a patent infringement case, the district court properly construed the claim term "pivot" and properly determined that the accused product, a stowaway portable keyboard, did not meet that limitation, either literally or under the doctrine of equivalents.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

  www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us
  CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.