 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Giese v. OPM, 05-3229,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 30, 2006, Decided , January 30, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Hakim v. Cannon Avent Group, PLC, 06-1075,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 30, 2006, Decided , January 30, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Hamilton Secs. Advisory Servs. v. United States, 05-5016,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 30, 2006, Decided , January 30, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re Johnston, 05-1321 (Serial No. 09/312,992),
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 30, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: United States Patent and Trademark Office Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences properly affirmed a patent examiner's rejection of all claims in a patent application for large diameter spirally formed pipe as each of the patent claims was anticipated by several references.
|
|||||
| Bitare v. DOJ, 04-3261,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 31, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: INS decision, affirmed by AJ, which found employee knowingly processed petitions out of order and too early was unsupported by substantial evidence; among other things, evidence regarding one application was consistent with request for humanitarian wavier, and employee asserted he processed application based on mentor's informing him it was proper.
|
|||||
| Genlyte Thomas Group LLC v. Lutron Elecs. Co., 05-1496, 05-1506,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 31, 2006, Decided , January 31, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Richlin Sec. Serv. Co. v. Chertoff, 05-1085,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 31, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where a contractor's employees were awarded back wages due to a misclassification of the employees in a government contract, the contractor was not entitled to interest on the award under the Contract Disputes Act since the wages were due to the employees rather than the contractor and the contractor incurred no out-of-pocket expense.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| Copyright© 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
