 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Andersen Corp. v. Fiber Composites, LLC, 05-1434, 06-1009,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 26, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In this patent action, the prosecution history provided strong support for defendant's argument that the Group II patent claims should be narrowly construed as limited to products made by the process described in the specification, rather than covering all composite structural members, regardless of the process by which they were produced.
|
|||||
| Hanlin v. Nicholson, 2006-7075,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 26, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where an attorney for the surviving spouse of a deceased veteran received fees from a benefits award to the spouse, fees from a subsequent award to the spouse's disabled adult son were properly denied since the attorney had no fee agreement with the son as required by 38 U.S.C.S. § 5904(c)(1), and the spouse and the son were not the same claimant.
|
|||||
| In re Seagate Tech., LLC, MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET NO. 830,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 26, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Int'l Elec. Tech. Corp. v. Hughes Aircraft Co., 2006-1368, 06-1368,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 26, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Stoyanov v. Dep't of the Navy, 2006-3363,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 26, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Merit Systems Protection Board properly concluded that it did not have jurisdiction to address complaints in the individual right of action (IRA), pursuant to 5 U.S.C.S. § 1221, because the allegations put forth in the employee's complaint involved personnel actions taken against the employee's brother, which were beyond the scope of the IRA claim.
|
|||||
| Thompson v. OPM, 2006-3262,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 26, 2007, Decided , January 26, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Bianchi v. United States, 06-5042,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 29, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where contractor asserted that government improperly paid administrative award in contract dispute to contractor's assignee, jurisdiction was proper since contractor properly alleged government's breach of settlement agreement, but government properly paid award to assignee which was expressly designated by contractor to receive contract proceeds.
|
|||||
| Chiron Corp. v. Sourcecf, Inc., 2006-1590,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 29, 2007, Decided , January 29, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Isr. Bio-Engineering Project v. Amgen Inc., 06-1218,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, January 29, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Investor claimed it had standing to sue for patent infringement, 35 U.S.C.S. § 281, because it owned the whole patent by assignment under a sub-research and development contract. However, the court held that, without a complete ownership interest or the voluntary joinder of the assignee, the investor lacked standing to sue for infringement.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
