 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Brown v. Barbacid, 05-1119,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, February 2, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences, erred in awarding priority to appellees based on its finding that appellants' reasonable diligence had not been shown, as appellants' inventor's testimony on diligence had been corroborated by a laboratory technician.
|
|||||
| In re Beyond Innovation Tech. Co., MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET NO. 812,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, February 2, 2006, Decided , February 2, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Issue under 28 U.S.C.S. § 455(a) was whether a reasonable person would harbor doubts concerning the judge's impartiality. Judge's determination of whether to disqualify was reviewed for an abuse of discretion. None was found where the damages witness was a close friend of the judge and his personal accountant. Mandamus petition was denied.
|
|||||
| Spin Master Ltd. v. Overbreak LLC, 06-1110,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, February 2, 2006, Decided , February 2, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Carreon v. OPM, 06-3117,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, February 3, 2006, Decided , February 3, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Marriott Int'l Resorts, L.P. v. United States, 05-5046,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, February 3, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service could delegate authority to invoke the deliberative process privilege on the agency's behalf; such delegation promoted efficiency in judicial administration and actual personal involvement in the complex process of invoking the privilege.
|
|||||
| Medichem, S.A. v. Rolabo, S.L., 05-1179, 05-1248,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, February 3, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Interference-in-fact existed between patents for making allergy medication, as defendant's patent rendered obvious plaintiff's patent since it would have been obvious to add tertiary amine. Plaintiff was erroneously awarded priority, as value of non-inventor's notebook fell short of that necessary for it to corroborate reduction to practice date.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
