 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Love v. United States Postal Serv., 05-3317,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, February 8, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Employee's demotion by the USPS was upheld because nothing in the record indicated that the USPS precluded the employee's review or in any way prevented her from access to the investigative report, and her demotion four days prior to end of 30-day notice period was harmless as there was no evidence a different outcome might have been reached.
|
|||||
| Mass. Bay Transp. Auth. v. United States, 05-5017,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, February 8, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A trial judge did not abuse its discretion by denying plaintiff's motion to disqualify because the judge's adverse legal rulings and courtroom remarks reflecting disagreements with plaintiff's legal arguments were an insufficient basis for recusal.
|
|||||
| Murray v. United States Postal Serv., 06-3100,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, February 8, 2006, Decided , February 8, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| White v. United States Postal Serv., 05-3310,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, February 8, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Employee's removal from service with USPS was upheld due to his being on leave for two years due to psychiatric occupational injury, physical inability to perform job, and low likelihood he would fully recover in near future; doctor's statement he might handle four hours of light-duty in future was insufficient to support finding he would return.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| Copyright© 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
